download HxD, open HxD load unepic.exe, click search Hex and search for 54 24 08 3B C2 74 0A C7 81 18 0D 00 00 01, u will get only 1 result change the last 01 to 00, save and exit. If you have set the colors for all countries, confirm the settings and a colored map will appear in a new window. patch the exe to disable the anticheat that would solve ya updating problem i did it to some months ago. Yes, I want to color the states with flags. Or the marked states will be colored with their own flag. Or select multiple countries and change the color of all selected countries at once here.You can individually select a color for each country.I’m just clarifying why I personally see problems with the idea.There are several options how to color the map: It could be used to look at patterns such as “do hawk sightings decrease where spur winged plover observations increase? Does that pattern continue when you look at it over time?” and so on.Īll this being said, it is not up to us to decide what iNat choose to implement! They may well have other good reasons for implementing this feature request that over-ride these concerns. I don’t like this idea for the purposes of helping to identify (to ssp based on historical geographic ranges), but I do like it for comparing ranges of two taxa. Those I am happy to ID based on geography! Having said that, I am constantly on the look out for strays that turn up from the other island, and if I ever encountered any I would very much reconsider my position on them. They are more likely to become prey than a mate, and the likelihood of the persistance of that gene incursion is minimal. They can wind up in human possessions while moving between the islands, so there is the chance of a stray turning up, but the impact of a few turning up is minimal given that they are a spider that eats spiders. On the other hand we have a couple species of ground spider in NZ, one in the north island and the other in the south island, they look identical (it is internal genitalic differences that differentiate them), and they don’t disperse via ballooning. Anything even remotely close to that boundary I tend to ID at genus. There is a very real chance that the ranges could alter over time, even with the Cook Straight as the barrier. I wouldn’t ID to ssp based on a map, but there are characters that if visible I would. We have this in NZ with fantails, there is a north island subspecies and a south island subspecies. Keeping them at genus level IDs is by far preferred over guessing on ssp based on a feedback loop. On that basis I would only identify based on geographical range if there was a clearly well defined reason for the geographical split. Particularly if the edges of the range were to shift over time as global warming and human impacts on environment cause the boundary between the two to shift, it will likely not reflect in the maps if people are IDing based on the maps!įor ssp where there is a definite boundary, such as (large) body of water or mountain range, then the chances of strays appearing out of range are smaller, and the impacts in terms of the genetics between the two ssp is likely to be minimal (assuming they came from the same gene pool before their geographic split). This is the concern for the feedback ssp with interfacing ranges, using the coloured pins and their extents on the map to support future IDs, even based on accurate IDs on the existing RG obs, is a definite feedback loop. It could increase accuracy and ease of identification. Pin color might start to get a little crazy with too many groupings. Same could be done at the Genus level (different colors on the genus map for research grade observations of different species). I see this as a simple way of assisting in the core observation / ID process for users who want to use range to assist their decision but are not familiar with other analytical tools - or may be away from them: in the field / on their phone / etc. There is definitely a lot of untapped potential with the maps and I understand the idea of exporting and analyzing using an external tool. This wouldn’t involve drawing any boundaries, but would show the general distribution of observations in the map at a glance via the pins. “Needs ID” at the species or subspecies level could all be the same color as the species, its own unique color, filtered out… or the same color as its species/subspecies but indicated by a different shape. Research Grade Observations at the level of the species could be one color and research grade observations of a subspecies would get a color specific to the subspecies. I intended it only for “Research Grade” observations ID’d to subspecies:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |